Narrative Structures, Gender, And Power Dynamics In Shakespeare's King Lear And The Tempest: An Interdisciplinary Comparative Analysis

Main Article Content

Jigyasa Sharma, Dr. Ram Naresh Singh Tomar

Abstract

William Shakespeare's King Lear and The Tempest are among his most significant plays, offering profound insights into narrative construction, gender representation, and the dynamics of political and social power. This study presents an interdisciplinary comparative analysis of these two plays by integrating narrative theory, feminist literary criticism, and political analysis. Using a qualitative research methodology based on close textual reading and comparative literary analysis, the study examines how Shakespeare employs contrasting narrative structures to explore authority, leadership, gender identity, and ethical governance. The findings reveal that King Lear follows a tragic narrative that exposes the consequences of failed leadership, patriarchal authority, and political disorder, whereas The Tempest adopts a restorative narrative emphasizing reconciliation, forgiveness, and responsible governance. The study further demonstrates that female characters, including Cordelia, Goneril, Regan, Miranda, and Sycorax, play crucial roles in shaping power relations and challenging traditional gender hierarchies. The comparative analysis highlights that narrative structure, gender, and power are deeply interconnected, with Shakespeare using dramatic form to question absolute authority and promote justice, moral responsibility, and ethical leadership. By combining literary criticism with interdisciplinary perspectives, this research contributes to Shakespearean studies and demonstrates the continuing relevance of his works to contemporary discussions of gender equality, political authority, leadership, and social justice.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jigyasa Sharma, Dr. Ram Naresh Singh Tomar. (2026). Narrative Structures, Gender, And Power Dynamics In Shakespeare’s King Lear And The Tempest: An Interdisciplinary Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Advanced Research and Multidisciplinary Trends (IJARMT), 3(3), 409–421. Retrieved from https://ijarmt.com/index.php/j/article/view/1197
Section
Articles

References

Bal, M. (2017). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative (4th ed.). University of Toronto Press.

Belsey, C. (1985). The subject of tragedy: Identity and difference in Renaissance drama. Methuen.

Bevington, D. (Ed.). (2014). The complete works of Shakespeare (7th ed.). Pearson.

Bradley, A. C. (1904). Shakespearean tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. Macmillan.

Brooks, C. (1947). The well wrought urn: Studies in the structure of poetry. Harcourt Brace.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Cornell University Press.

Dollimore, J., & Sinfield, A. (2004). Political Shakespeare: Essays in cultural materialism (2nd ed.). Manchester University Press.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.

Greenblatt, S. (1988). Shakespearean negotiations: The circulation of social energy in Renaissance England. University of California Press.

Greenblatt, S. (Ed.). (2010). The Norton Shakespeare (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton.

Jardine, L. (1989). Still harping on daughters: Women and drama in the age of Shakespeare. Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Loomba, A. (2014). Shakespeare, race, and colonialism. Oxford University Press.

Skinner, Q. (1978). The foundations of modern political thought (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.

Bal, M. (2017). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative (4th ed.). University of Toronto Press.

Belsey, C. (1985). The subject of tragedy: Identity and difference in Renaissance drama. Methuen.

Bevington, D. (Ed.). (2014). The complete works of Shakespeare (7th ed.). Pearson.

Bradley, A. C. (1904). Shakespearean tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. Macmillan.

Brooks, C. (1947). The well wrought urn: Studies in the structure of poetry. Harcourt Brace.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Cornell University Press.

Dollimore, J., & Sinfield, A. (2004). Political Shakespeare: Essays in cultural materialism (2nd ed.). Manchester University Press.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.

Greenblatt, S. (1988). Shakespearean negotiations: The circulation of social energy in Renaissance England. University of California Press.

Greenblatt, S. (Ed.). (2010). The Norton Shakespeare (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton.

Jardine, L. (1989). Still harping on daughters: Women and drama in the age of Shakespeare. Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Loomba, A. (2014). Shakespeare, race, and colonialism. Oxford University Press.

Neill, M. (1987). Issues of death: Mortality and identity in English Renaissance tragedy. Clarendon Press.

Similar Articles

<< < 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.