Impact of Brain-Based Learning Strategies on Teaching Methods and Student Learning Outcomes at the Secondary School Level

Main Article Content

Jawad Parayangattu, Dr. Sarika Goel

Abstract

The blend of neuroscience and education has sparked the rise of brain-based learning, an approach designed to sync teaching methods with the way our brains actually learn. This study dives into how brain-based learning strategies influence teaching styles, student engagement, and academic success in secondary schools. Rooted in concepts like neuroplasticity, cognitive load, executive function, and affective neuroscience, the research utilized a convergent mixed-methods design. A quasi-experimental method was employed to compare the academic performance and engagement levels of students taught with brain-based strategies against those who experienced traditional teaching methods. Quantitative data came from achievement tests and student engagement scales, while qualitative insights were gathered through classroom observations and interviews with teachers. The results showed that students who engaged with brain-based learning strategies achieved significantly better academically and were more engaged. Teachers also noted positive shifts in their teaching practices and the overall classroom environment. The study wraps up by affirming that brain-based learning is a powerful, evidence-backed teaching approach that boosts teaching effectiveness and nurtures well-rounded student development.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jawad Parayangattu, Dr. Sarika Goel. (2024). Impact of Brain-Based Learning Strategies on Teaching Methods and Student Learning Outcomes at the Secondary School Level. International Journal of Advanced Research and Multidisciplinary Trends (IJARMT), 1(2), 689–697. Retrieved from https://ijarmt.com/index.php/j/article/view/710
Section
Articles

References

Ansari, D., & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: Education and neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.007

Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2

Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (2014). Natural learning for a connected world: Education, technology, and the human brain. Teachers College Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427(6972), 311–312. https://doi.org/10.1038/427311a

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817–824. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817

Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x

Immordino-Yang, M. H., Darling-Hammond, L., & Krone, C. (2019). Nurturing nature: How brain development is inherently social and emotional. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1633924

Kolb, B., & Gibb, R. (2011). Brain plasticity and behaviour in the developing brain. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20(4), 265–276.

McEwen, B. S., & Morrison, J. H. (2013). The brain on stress: Vulnerability and plasticity of the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(45), 17624–17634. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3028-13.2013

Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006

Sousa, D. A. (2017). How the brain learns (5th ed.). Corwin Press.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4

Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2011). Mind, brain, and education science: A comprehensive guide to the new brain-based teaching. W. W. Norton & Company.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Similar Articles

<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.