An Analytical Study of Explainable AI Models for High-Stakes Decision Systems
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming more and more common in critical decision-making areas like healthcare diagnosis, financial risk assessment, and criminal justice, where the stakes are incredibly high and the consequences can be serious and irreversible. Even though advanced machine learning models often boast impressive predictive accuracy, their black-box nature raises important issues around transparency, trust, fairness, and accountability. This has sparked a growing interest in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), which seeks to make AI-driven decisions clearer and more reliable for the people involved. In this paper, we dive into an analytical study of explainable AI models used in these high-stakes environments, focusing on finding the right balance between predictive performance and interpretability. We compare traditional black-box models with those that are inherently interpretable, as well as post-hoc explanation techniques. We take a closer look at popular XAI methods like Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to see how feature-level explanations can boost transparency without significantly sacrificing accuracy.
To back up our findings, we conduct experimental analysis using benchmark datasets that are commonly used in critical decision-making fields, including healthcare, finance, and criminal justice. We evaluate models like Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting using standard performance metrics alongside criteria focused on explainability. The results show that explainable frameworks not only enhance model transparency and user trust but also maintain competitive predictive performance. The study emphasizes how crucial explainability is when it comes to tackling ethical issues, spotting biases, and ensuring compliance with regulations in high-risk situations. In essence, the findings show that explainable AI is key to creating decision support systems that are trustworthy, accountable, and centered on human needs. This makes it absolutely vital for the responsible use of AI in high-stakes scenarios.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.
European Union. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Official Journal of the European Union.
Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2018). A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(5), 1–42.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3236009
Lipton, Z. C. (2018). The mythos of model interpretability. Communications of the ACM, 61(10), 36–43.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3233231
Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 4765–4774.
Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable (2nd ed.).
https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2023). AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST, U.S. Department of Commerce.
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135–1144.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Samek, W., Wiegand, T., & Müller, K. R. (2017). Explainable artificial intelligence: Understanding, visualizing and interpreting deep learning models. ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries, 1(1).
Zhang, Q., & Zhu, S. C. (2018). Visual interpretability for deep learning: A survey. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 19(1), 27–39.
https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1700808
Barredo Arrieta, A., et al. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115.