Morphometric, Meristic, and Genetic Variability of Golden Mahseer (Tor putitora): An Integrated Assessment

Main Article Content

Km. Pratima Srivastava, Dr. Sachin Chaudhary

Abstract

A keystone freshwater fish of the Himalayas, the Golden Mahseer (Tor putitora) has seen a sharp decline in population as a result of habitat fragmentation, overexploitation, and genetic erosion. Morphometric, meristic, and RAPD-based genetic analyses are combined in this study to evaluate stock structure and population variability. 120 specimens in all were examined at three different sampling sites. Ten meristic characters and twenty morphometric traits were noted using standard ichthyological procedures. 14 morphometric characters showed significant variation (p < 0.05), but meristic traits were mostly conserved. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed population-level differentiation by classifying samples into three separate clusters.Samples were divided into three separate clusters using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), which demonstrated population-level differentiation. Ten primers were used for RAPD profiling, which produced 78.4% polymorphism and genetic similarity values between populations ranging from 0.62 to 0.88. According to the combination of morphological and genetic markers, T. putitora populations exhibit moderate-to-high differentiation, which is probably influenced by environmental heterogeneity and river fragmentation. Implications for conservation include the necessity of basin-specific management techniques and genetically informed hatchery practices.

Article Details

How to Cite
Km. Pratima Srivastava, Dr. Sachin Chaudhary. (2025). Morphometric, Meristic, and Genetic Variability of Golden Mahseer (Tor putitora): An Integrated Assessment. International Journal of Advanced Research and Multidisciplinary Trends (IJARMT), 2(2), 1198–1208. Retrieved from https://ijarmt.com/index.php/j/article/view/588
Section
Articles

References

Bagherian, A., &Rahmani, H. (2009). Morphological differentiation between two populations of Chalcalburnuschalcoides using truss network analysis.

Baruah, D. (2023). Ecological impacts of hydroelectric projects on aquatic biodiversity in the Indian Himalayan region.

Bhatt, J. P., Nautiyal, P., & Singh, H. R. (2016). Ecology, migration behaviour and conservation needs of Golden Mahseer (Tor putitora) in Himalayan rivers.

Chasanah, E., Fadila, R., &Prihatiningsih, N. (2021). Comparative nutritional evaluation of wild and cultured Tor soro: Amino acid, fatty acid, mineral and proximate composition.

Clayton, D. A. (1981). The use of meristic characteristics in fish systematics. Journal of Zoology.

Dash, P., Sharma, R., &Sahu, N. P. (2023). Thermal acclimation effects on oxidative stress, Hsps and metabolic enzymes in Neolissochilushexagonolepis.

Dhinakaran, A., Rema Devi, K., &Indra, T. J. (2011). Morphometric variability in three Garra species from southern India.

El-Zaeem, S. Y. (2011). Morphological and meristic differentiation between Mugilcephalus and Liza ramada (Family Mugilidae).

El-Zaeem, S. Y., Ahmed, A. I., & Hassan, I. M. (2012). Intraspecific morphometric variation between wild and cultured populations of Oreochromisniloticus.

Helfman, G. S., Collette, B. B., &Facey, D. E. (1997). The diversity of fishes: Biology, evolution, and ecology. Blackwell Science.

Ihssen, P. E., Booke, H. E., Casselman, J. M., McGlade, J. M., Payne, N. R., & Utter, F. M. (1981). Stock identification: Materials and methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.

Jaafar, F., Esa, Y. B., & Aziz, F. (2021). A taxonomic review of Tor, Neolissochilus, and Naziritor with emphasis on Southeast Asian mahseer diversity and identification.

Johnson, J. A., Singh, A., &Patra, S. (2023). Reassessment of Tor mahanadicus using morphological and mitochondrial DNA markers.

Kendall Jr., A. W., Vinter, B. M., & Coyle, J. P. (2007). Morphological variation in pelagic juvenile rockfishes (Sebastes spp.).

Khare, P., Singh, M., Das, P., &Lal, K. K. (2014). Molecular systematics of Tor, Neolissochilus, and Naziritor using COI and D-loop mtDNA sequences.

Khudamrongsawat, J., Musa, N., & Ahmad, A. (2021). Advances in broodstock development and breeding of Malaysian Mahseer (Tor spp.)—Five years of R&D.

Mallik, S. K., Samal, R., &Mohanty, J. (2023). Toxicity and residue depletion of emamectin benzoate in Golden Mahseer (Tor putitora).

Manimegalai, G., Jawahar, P., &Muthukrishnan, S. (2010). Morphometric analysis of Etropusmaculatus based on weight–length relationships.

McKinnon, J. S., & Rundle, H. D. (2002). Speciation and ecological drivers of morphological diversification.

Mohd. Hussain, M. (2007). Morphometric characterization and species differentiation in Channa spp.

Muhd. Naeem, M., Salam, A., &Ishtiaq, M. (2011). Morphometric relationships in hatchery-raised Oreochromismossambicus males.

Nautiyal, P. (2013). A review of taxonomy, biology, ecology, and conservation issues of Indian mahseer.

Nur, R., Chakraborty, D., &Bhutia, P. (2022). Length-weight relationship and condition factor of Neolissochilushexagonolepis fingerlings from River Ghish.

Pinder, A. C., Raghavan, R., Britton, J. R., &Everard, M. (2019). Mahseer (Tor spp.) of South and Southeast Asia: Status, threats, and conservation priorities. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

Rathod, V., Gogoi, D., &Baruah, K. (2022). Temperature effects on growth, oxidative stress and hematology of Golden Mahseer (Tor putitora).

Sarma, D., Das, P., & Singh, S. (2022). Global distribution, ecological significance and conservation challenges of mahseer species (Tor, Neolissochilus, Naziritor).

Sarkar, U. K., Pathak, A. K., & Sinha, R. K. (2015). Decline of mahseer populations in Indian rivers: Threats and conservation needs.

Solem, O., & Berg, O. K. (2011). Morphological differences in Norwegian Atlantic salmon populations and their ecological significance.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.