Dematerialisation and the Depository System in India: A Legal and Market-Structure Analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Dematerialisation converted the Indian securities market from a paper-based ownership register into an electronic book-entry system, and it is the reform that made every later settlement improvement possible. This paper examines the legal architecture and market consequences of that conversion. Using a doctrinal method supported by secondary market data, it analyses the Depositories Act, 1996, the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and the SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 2018, and traces how the two-depository structure of NSDL and CDSL operates through registered depository participants. Four findings emerge. The statutory shift of title into book-entry form under Sections 4 and 10 of the Depositories Act removed the certificate as the source of title and eliminated the categories of dispute that afflicted the paper regime. The compression of the settlement cycle from T+5 in 2001 to mandatory T+1 in January 2023 and optional T+0 from March 2024 was contingent on dematerialisation rather than merely coincident with it. Demat accounts grew from about 4.1 crore in March 2020 to roughly 23.15 crore by June 2026. The residual problems of the system are behavioural and cyber-operational rather than documentary. India’s depository law is therefore infrastructurally complete but regulatorily unfinished.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
The Depositories Act, 1996 (No. 22 of 1996).
The Companies Act, 2013 (No. 18 of 2013), ss. 2(84), 29, 38, 44, 45, 46, 56(4), 447.
The Companies Act, 1956, s. 68B, inserted by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, s. 12(1A).
The Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, Rule 9.
SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 2018.
SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, Reg. 40.
The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, Second Schedule.
Echeverri-Gent, J. (2004) ‘Financial Globalization and India’s Equity Market Reforms’, India Review, 3(4), pp. 306–332.
Gorham, M. and Singh, N. (2009) Electronic Exchanges: The Global Transformation from Pits to Bits. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Patil, R.H. (2010) ‘Financial Sector Reforms: Realities and Myths’, Economic and Political Weekly, 45(19), pp. 48–61.
Shah, A. and Thomas, S. (1997) ‘Securities Markets: Towards Greater Efficiency’, in Parikh, K. (ed.) India Development Report. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Shah, A. and Thomas, S. (2000) ‘David and Goliath: Displacing a Primary Market’, Journal of Global Financial Markets, 1(1), pp. 14–21.
Thomas, S. (2006) ‘How the Financial Sector in India Was Reformed’, in Narayan, S. (ed.) Documenting Reforms: Case Studies from India. New Delhi: Macmillan India.
National Securities Depository Limited, Annual Report, Bye-Laws and Business Rules, Mumbai.
Central Depository Services (India) Limited, Periodic Statistics and Bye-Laws, Mumbai.
Securities and Exchange Board of India, Annual Report and Monthly Bulletin, Mumbai.
Securities and Exchange Board of India, circular on the beta launch of the optional T+0 rolling settlement cycle, 21 March 2024.
‘NSDL adds 59 lakh demat accounts in FY26’, Outlook Money, 16 June 2026.
‘NSE unique client codes hit 26 crore as June demat additions bounce’, 16 July 2026.
‘T+0 settlement kick starts today’, Business Standard, 28 March 2024.