Decentralization and Citizen Participation: Strengthening Local Governance in Rural India

Main Article Content

Sapna
Dr. Chandvir

Abstract

This research project looks into the transformative implications of democratic decentralisation and institutionalised public involvement for local governance in rural India. The governance structure of India has been transformed from a centralised administrative model to a multi-tiered system following the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992 and the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) have been recognised as a new tier of local self-government. In this paper we explore the dual processes of political and fiscal decentralisation and highlight the significance of Gram Sabha as a forum of direct democracy and the participation of the disadvantaged groups – women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as they engage in decision making. The paper emphasises the importance of AI-powered meeting summarisation tools like SabhaSaar and digital governance projects like eGramSwaraj in enhancing accountability and transparency in rural administration, as per the data from 2024-2026. This essay explores the importance of social audits in preventing elite capture and improving the implementation of key welfare programmes such as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS). The study reveals systemic barriers including bureaucratic delays, patriarchal mediation (the phenomena of ‘Sarpanch Pati’) and dependence on central funds for finances even when there has been considerable progress in digital traceability and procedural representation. Comparative examination at the state level shows that certain states like Kerala and West Bengal have been successful in institutionalising community based planning while others are caught up in “malignant” institutional structures that prevent real devolution. But research suggests that the move from superficial involvement to substantive empowerment, driven by the development of the subsidiarity principle, autonomous supervisory mechanisms and enhanced web literacy, will improve rural government. India’s grassroots movement is an example of an inclusive global paradigm of marrying state-led initiatives with community-centric sustainable development prioritising local community autonomy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sapna, & Dr. Chandvir. (2026). Decentralization and Citizen Participation: Strengthening Local Governance in Rural India. International Journal of Advanced Research and Multidisciplinary Trends (IJARMT), 3(3), 929–937. Retrieved from https://ijarmt.com/index.php/j/article/view/1287
Section
Articles

References

• Singh, S. (2025). Malignity in decentralization of natural resource governance in India. Policy and Society, 44(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puaf022

• Kumar, S., & Madheswaran, S. (2019). Social audit of MGNREGA-A panacea or a placebo? Issues and ways forward in Karnataka (No. 457).

• Chinnadurai, A. S., & Imam, M. (2025). Gram Sabha to Governance: Participation, Representation, and Local Decision-Making in Rural India. Indian Growth and Development Policy, 1: 2, pp. 225-241.

• Madia, K., FCS. (2025). The changing face of rural governance: History and development of panchayats in India. In Chartered Secretary.

• B, K. V. (2025). Assessing the impact of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment on Panchayati Raj: A two decade retrospective. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i01.35121

• Barman, P. (2024). Decentralization and Rural development in India: An Overview. In International Journal of Research and Review (Vol. 11, Issue 4, pp. 462–463). https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.11_Issue.4_April2024/IJRR52.pdf

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.